—
## FBI Targets Archive.today Owner: What You Need to Know
The FBI’s recent move to unmask the owner of Archive.today, a widely used web archiving service, has sent shockwaves through the online community. This development raises important questions about digital privacy and the future of web archiving. Here’s what you need to know about the situation and its implications.
### The Subpoena Explained
On November 6, 2025, the FBI issued a subpoena to Canadian domain registrar Tucows, seeking to reveal the identity of the anonymous owner of Archive.today. This action is part of an ongoing federal criminal investigation, although specific details about the alleged crime remain undisclosed.
The subpoena requests a comprehensive set of data from Tucows, which includes:
– **Basic Identifying Information**: Name, address, and billing details of the Archive.today owner.
– **Communication Records**: Telephone records, including incoming and outgoing calls and messages.
– **Financial Information**: Payment details such as credit card numbers.
– **Technical Data**: Internet session times, device identifiers, and IP addresses.
The FBI’s request also prohibits Tucows from disclosing the subpoena’s existence, which is intended to prevent interference with the investigation. However, Archive.today’s public posting of the document has rendered this confidentiality moot.
### Understanding Archive.today
Launched in 2012, Archive.today serves as an essential tool for journalists and researchers. Similar to the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine, it allows users to create permanent snapshots of web pages, preserving content that may change or disappear over time.
The service is particularly valued for its reliability, as it rarely deletes saved pages, except in extreme cases like child pornography. Archive.today gained notoriety during the 2014 GamerGate controversy, where it was used to track article edits while avoiding directing traffic to specific websites.
### Implications for Web Privacy
The FBI’s actions raise significant concerns about online anonymity and digital privacy. As web archiving becomes increasingly scrutinized, users may need to reconsider how they use services like Archive.today.
#### Actionable Takeaways:
1. **Evaluate Your Digital Footprint**: If you utilize web archiving services, be mindful of the information you share. Consider using VPNs or privacy-focused browsers to enhance your anonymity online.
2. **Stay Informed**: Follow developments related to the FBI’s investigation and similar cases that may impact digital privacy laws and web services.
3. **Use Alternative Services**: Explore other web archiving options that may offer greater privacy protections or different functionalities, such as the Internet Archive or other decentralized platforms.
4. **Advocate for Privacy Rights**: Engage in discussions about digital privacy and advocate for policies that protect online anonymity and freedom of expression.
### Conclusion
The FBI’s subpoena for the owner of Archive.today underscores the tension between law enforcement and digital privacy. As this situation unfolds, it serves as a critical reminder for users to remain vigilant about their online activities and the tools they employ for web archiving. By understanding the implications and taking proactive steps, users can better navigate the evolving landscape of digital privacy and security.
